WebSep 30, 2024 · State of U.P. and Ors.: (2010) 2 SCC 114; Amar Singh v. Union of India and Ors. (2011) 7 SCC 69 and State of Uttaranchal v. Balwant Singh Chaufal and Ors. (2010) 3 SCC 402]. ... Finally, at paragraph No.60, extracted a paragraph from Dalip Singh v. State of U.P. and others, [(2010) 2 SCC 114]: "53. Courts have, over the centuries, frowned …
14 in a joint trial of accused the court is required - Course Hero
WebThe Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Dalip Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others, reported in (2010)2 SCC 114 came down heavily on unscrupulous litigants by holding that it is now well established that a litigant who attempts to pollute the stream of justice or who touches the pure fountain of justice with tainted hands, is not ... WebThe appeal preferred by Shri Praveen Singh against the order of the Prescribed Authority was dismissed by Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Allahabad (Appellate Authority) in … prof andre coetzee
Compilation of Important Case Law on the Point of Defective …
Webdalip singh vs. state of u p - supreme court of india - december 03, 2009. ... the state of u.p. and ors. [laws(all)-2010-10-367] [referred to] ramjeet upadhyaya vs. deputy director … WebSCC 434; Ram Singh v. Sonia MANU/SC/7109/2007 : (2007) 3 SCC 1; State of U.P. v. Satish MANU/SC/0090/2005 : (2005) 3 SCC 114; Holiram Bordoli v. State of Assam MANU/SC/0271/2005 : (2005) 3 SCC 793; Saibanna v. State of Karnatka MANU/SC/0306/2005 : (2005) 4 SCC 165; Karan Singh v. State of U.P. … WebMay 31, 2016 · In Dalip Singh v. State of U.P., 2010 2 SCC 114, the Supreme Court observed that a new creed of litigants have cropped up in the last 40 years who do not have any respect for truth and shamelessly resort to falsehood and unethical means for achieving their goals. The observations of the Supreme Court are as under:-. relief casting